Bolson on… Observations and opinion on “We the People…”

For Geraldine Ferraro: Obama’s popularity is a black and white issue.

Posted in Uncategorized by bolsonon on March 11, 2008

geraldine-ferraro.jpg

Former member of the U.S. House of Representatives and the first and only woman to date to represent a major U.S. political party as a candidate for Vice President, Geraldine Ferraro, wins today’s jab de jour award–and the Obama brigade was quickly and conveniently offended.

It’s the latest in this season’s pathetic and potentially politically fatal Democrat party donnybrook between Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

The scenario is all too familiar for these rarely candid and always calculated candidates: First you hit hard. Have your aide or spokesperson hurl the next stone, say something silly, annoying, or insulting (or better yet, all three…).

Then you immediately and with complete mock sincerity fein shock and dismay. Following that up with your official and unwavering vow to never, ever, ever, let such a thing happen again. Which you back up by publicly firing the offending party while your opponent’s campaign cries bloody murder from the highest mountain.

It is the political equivalent of watching the Imperial Russian Ballet perform. Each step so precise. Each movement so well rehearsed and planned by both troupes.

Ferraro officially entered the frey with her thus far unapologetic remarks made in a recent interview published by a California newspaper. Ferraro, a Clinton campaign member, suggested that Barack Obama wouldn’t be where he is in his campaign today if Obama were a white man or a woman of any color.

Release the hounds… The reaction has largely been, as you might expect with this race, black and white… That of universal offense, outrage, and anger… Immediately followed by cries and catterwalls for Ferraro to be publicly flogged, fileted, and eventually forgotten–after of course, all of the political juice has been squeezed from the rather milquetoast remarks.

Also not unexpectedly, Obama responded that the remarks were divisive and “patently absurd,” while Clinton shrugged the remarks off as regrettable, personal, and unfortunate.

In the words of Linda Ellerbee, one of my favorite broadcasters of all time: “And so it goes…”

If you are John McCain or a McCain supporter, you have to be lapping this stuff up with a very large kitchen spoon. Think about it, you have Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama beating each other over the head daily, almost hourly, with ridiculous rhetoric and rapid-fire and equally repellent “response,” while simultaneously spending every dollar they can to do it. To borrow a phrase from horse racing, if you’re McCain you have to be secretly thinking, “Go Baby Go!”

But some will be quick to defend Ferraro’s largely irrelevant political and personal insight. And understandably so. Ferraro knows quite a lot about being a pastel political icon. After all, when Ferraro was Walter Mondale’s running mate in 1984, the Mondale/Ferraro ticket lost in an embarrasing landslide. So perhaps she knows of what she speaks about Obama.

In this case, no. Ferraro is, in fact, wrong. Dead wrong.

She is utterly and unquestionably wrong because any other fresh-faced, smooth-talking, and pathetically pandering politician would, in fact, also easily enjoy the same rapid rise to prominence that Barack Obama is currently experiencing.

Historically, the Democrat base has proven time after time that they are always ready and willing to be led by any person or party preaching their favorite collective Democrat hymn: O’ Promise Me (that the government will take care of me).

And the choir, in this case, is singing along at the top of their lungs and swaying to and fro with their hands raised high in the air.

As of this evening, Ferraro has refused to back off her remarks and has, instead, sought to elaborate and validate. So the story will have legs for the foreseeable future–at least until the next staffer steps up and places their tongue in fast-forward and their head on the proverbial political chopping block.

And to think we only have six more months of this until the Democrat convention. Then the feuding and fussing really begins–and the mainstream media has their notebooks, cameras, and recorders at the ready.

13 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Geraldine said, on March 11, 2008 at 9:22 pm

    “She is utterly and unquestionably wrong because any other fresh-faced, smooth-talking, and pathetically pandering politician would, in fact, also easily enjoy the same rapid rise to prominence that Barack Obama is currently experiencing.”

    Like John Edwards, who lost to Kerry last election? John Edwards was seen as completely irrelevant. Obama, on the other hand, is relevant *because* of his race. It matters on every level… it almost borders on the metaphysical, you could say. By virtue of his African heritage, Obama is a taller, more manly, more assertive, more poignant and dramatic a candidate than Edwards could ever have hoped to be in his wildest fantasies.

    Not only that, but 400 years of African-American history have carved a wide swathe for this gentleman. Think specifically of the nearly 20-year rap craze. That alone could be considered the deciding factor in Obama’s candidacy right there. Barack owes the world to Public Enemy, and he won’t forget it.

    His offense is all feigned…. no, it isn’t. He’s offended because it’s *so true*. How could it not be? 50% of the US population listens to rap and r&b. Every day, the white boys here their favorite artists sing about b*s and h*s, and they say “Damn straight”.

    I think you know that also. You are turning a blind eye to the truth.

    As for “O’ Promise Me (that the government will take care of me)”, just a year ago, Americans were polled and 90% said the definitive issue for them will be the war in Iraq, and none other. Let’s face it, we’re bleeding money out the *$s for a country that hates us halfway across the world, and these neo-con Tax-and-Spend-Republicans are taxing us to death until at last we will need Japan to protect us from invasion by China. It never ceases to amaze me how stupid modern Republicans can be, they completely fail to grasp the concepts of true Conservatism. They blindly follow their leaders into the midst of a massive Recession and accompanying massive transference of wealth to investors in Defense Contractor companies.

    The American Dream is dead and now out of reach for the average American. It won’t be soon before you, too, will have the pleasure of choosing between a government handout, and accompanying invasion of your privacy and loss of all your freedoms, or starvation of yourself and your family. You’ll probably *still* be jabbering about your neo-con candidates by then. Enjoy.

  2. Annette said, on March 11, 2008 at 10:03 pm

    Hey, I found your link…nice; and you obviously have a lot more time on your hands than I do…I’m slightly envious!

    http://www.avandekamp.wordpress.com

  3. Vigilante said, on March 11, 2008 at 10:15 pm

    One of the reasons why Barack Obama was right when he observed that the Republicans had the big ideas in the 1980’s is because Democrats had so many small-minded leaders, like Geraldine Ferraro, at the head of their party.

  4. bolsonon said, on March 11, 2008 at 10:18 pm

    Dear Geraldine:

    I am not sure what exactly it is that you are smoking but you clearly scored top shelf stuff. Picking your inane analogies apart in this case will be as easy as picking Geraldine Ferraro out of the crowd at a Fifty-Cent concert…

    Comparing Barack Obama to John Edwards is tantamount to comparing glass to plexiglass. Both are frighteningly transparent and there isn’t much there there. If your reason for voting for Barack Obama is because he is taller than John Edwards, you need to turn in your voter registration card and slip into a nice pair of fuzzy slippers for your needed stay at the local looney bin.

    You are clearly guzzling the Barack Obama Kool-Aid with a barrel-sized ladle when you assert that Barack Obama owes his rise to political prominence to rap music. Which makes your comments about Republicans blindly following their leaders so laughable I think I may have cracked a rib from howling while reading it.

    I’m not sure where you have been for the past year but today’s polls do not reflect your “point” of last year’s top voter concern. It is now the economy. Keep up or go back to bed and wait for the next visiting hours when your concerned relatives can visit you there on the ward. Sorry that we had to remove your belt and those potentially sharp objects in your housecoat pockets.

    Finally, the American dream is not dead. Far from it. It is your brain that has quite obviously flat-lined many moons ago. And all of the baseless bitterness and moaning and groaning in your shameful soul will not end it anytime soon–except in your mind.

    When “poor-me” people like you and Michelle Obama choose to trash our country in an attempt to perpetuate your self-imposed victimization, it is repugnant and reprehensible. What are you doing to improve the situation other than wringing your hands and crying “why me”?

    Take your tedious tirade and tiresome testimony of “Hate America First” elsewhere. I’ll not waste another moment trying to figure how someone such as yourself sinks to such a low-brow mindset in a world that offers such opportunity.

    Robert

  5. cicada16 said, on March 11, 2008 at 10:29 pm

    Geraldine is only telling the truth. Barack would be nowhere close to being a nominee if he weren’t black. Know it is not politically……….

  6. thegoreyears said, on March 11, 2008 at 11:01 pm

    Thanks for your comment to my silly post on the Gore Years. I found my way back to you and all I can say is that, if Obama is gonna survive, he’ll need to take on a lot worse than what Geraldine Ferraro and Hillary dish out. I have, in the past, always sort of been okay with McCain as a person (not with his politics) and I think he himself will try to reign in the freaks in his party. But he’ll be unsuccessful. And we Democrats need to be okay with a few below the belt punches.

    I’ll vote for Hillary, even if she steals the election. That’s how desperate ****I**** am for change.

  7. thegoreyears said, on March 11, 2008 at 11:02 pm

    So, in other words, keep the eye on the prize.

  8. redmanbluestate said, on March 11, 2008 at 11:09 pm

    I don’t understand why it is so hard to understand? http://redmanbluestate.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/blackandright/

  9. staycspits said, on March 11, 2008 at 11:19 pm

    Other observation and opinion on Geraldine Ferraro, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, politics, and the road to the White House: http://staycspits@wordpress.com

  10. Albert Johnson Jr said, on March 12, 2008 at 2:44 pm

    Ms. Ferraro,

    I am terribly disappointed. Your recent suggestion that Mr. Obamas’ success happened only because he is black is especially painful. To think that being black in America is a lucky thing strikes me as being inconsiderate.

    I am a black person born the same year as Mr. Obamas’ wife 1964, and I can tell you at no time in my life was being black a lucky thing, or are you unaware of the sad and continuing legacy of American race relations. You disregard Mr. Obamas’ legitimate and laudable accomplishments by attributing them to one thing, and it’s the one thing Mr. Obama tries least to be – a man of race. Mr. Obama is a child of God, a husband, a father, a university graduate and a lawyer. Mr. Obama has been a stellar state representative of Illinois and he is currently a United States Senator, and great American. Somewhere probably in the high teens of the list of things Mr. Obama is would be black man.

    The statements you have made and defend amount to making his race his primary attribute. You are playing the race card in a manner that is insulting, and quite frankly would be more expected from the kind of reactionary people America has hopefully outgrown.

    In 1984 I was a student at the University of Southern California an institution with a traditionally conservative bent. I remember campaigning for and ardently defending a certain congressperson from New York as being more than just a woman, but a person regardless of gender worthy to potentially lead this country. I’m sorry to know now that I was wrong, and all the time any Gerard really would have sufficed.

  11. gilberto said, on March 12, 2008 at 6:33 pm

    Hillary Clinton’s campaign is not working because what she stands for doe not resonate among certain voters in America. She resorts to spinning half truths with the hope that other “spingalis” will join her to furtner spin halftruths with the hope that voters will support those efforts.

    As this campaign unfold, the more Hillary convinces me that she does not speak the truth because she spends most of her time attacking Obama and undermining Obama’s success with the American electorate. He is winning. To date her campaign is about inuendo, distortion, dishonesty because she cannot beat Obama fairly. Despite name recognition, her early lead has disappeared. African Americans, the young, the not so young have switched their allegiance to OBAMA based on his ability to lead and include us in the change when he becomes President of the U.S.A. Hillary is incapable of doing this because her political life does not translate into integrity, sincerity and honesty. Come November many, many friends and neighbors will vote o

  12. [...] Bolson on: For Geraldine Ferraro: Obama’s popularity is a black and white issue. [...]

  13. [...] Bolson on: For Geraldine Ferraro: Obama’s popularity is a black and white issue. [...]


Leave a Reply